Introduction

In the 1980’s universities became an abode for political activists who did not come for science and literature, but for spreading counterculture, marihuana and other items of “change”. In science, they were incapable and infantile. They started an avalanche of falsifications and plagiarism in research. By now, most of the research in biomedicine cannot be reproduced or is an outright fraud.

My main web site – http://www.universitytorontofraud.com tells how these cretins removed me from the university and plagiarised my discoveries; see the story and the 50 documents on Google Cached. This site is now continued with new documents at http://universitytorontofraud.wordpress.com/

My theoretical work reveals the basic pattern of cell proliferation in the organism. Surprisingly, the structure of carbon nanotubes discovered in 1992 exactly corresponded to the topological model of the living tissue proposed by me in 1980. Some references:
1. “Count of Cell Generations”,
https://sciencemishandled.files.wordpress.com/2013/03/1969-paper.pdf (in Russ.)
2. “Topological Solution for Cell Proliferation in Intestinal Crypt”,
J. theor. Biol. 1980 (87), 189-200
3. “Structure and Growth in the Living Tissue and in Carbon Nanotubes”,
https://arxiv.org/abs/1106.5705

Michael Pyshnov

PLEASE, SCROLL DOWN BEYOND THE ADVERTISEMENTS. IT’S NOT TRUE THAT THERE IS NOTHING BEYOND. THERE ARE MAY BE THE BEST ENTRIES ON THE GEITZLAND THERE.

Advertisements
Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

100 years under communist revolution

100 years ago, a gang of communists took over the government in Russia. In the new government of about 160 people (including Central Party Committee and Cheka), 5% were Russians, over 70% were jews, the rest were other minorities.

This happened in the middle of the First World War. Wilhelm II (who hated jews as well as Russians) first allowed the train with top communist leaders, who were in exile at the time, to pass through Germany to Russia. And he gave these jewish communists a huge amount of money, because he thought that they will destroy Russia and help him win the war. He was stupid: a year after, communists made revolution in Germany.

Communists won by deception. On the German money, they printed, in previously unheard of quantities, a newspaper for the Russian solders saying: “Stop fighting and hurry up home where now the property of landowners will be distributed to the people.” The front collapsed. Solders never got any land, but started the civil war in which 20 millions of Russians were killed.

Tzar, his wife, four daughters and son were shot in a basement room by two or three jewish communists, and the corpses were burned. George V, a cousin of the Tzar Nicholas II, who first promised to rescue the family, refused to do anything, it would be politically incorrect as British bankers hated Russia. The murder of the Tzar and his family was described in a book of R. Wilton, the London Times correspondent in Russia; he then was fired by the Times.

The members of the first communist government and Cheka (translated as Supreme Commission Against Contra-revolution and Antisemitism) continued until about early ’30s, when Stalin took power. This group, headed by Trotzki, ravaged Russia because their ideology required total destruction of all European civilization and Christianity. Communism, they said, cannot be built when “old” culture exists; they wanted the World Revolution. Stalin had to stop them. Trotzki and the survived members of his gang emigrated. They later begged Hitler to attack and destroy Russia.

Trotzkists survived in the West. In the end of the 20-th century they changed their name to Neoconservatives, Neocons. It was them who forced US to start war against Moslems. They hate not just the Western civilisation but the Moslem civilisation as well. They now are killing both.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Why there are no references to my papers?

There are only 20-something, while there should have been twenty thousands. Why so little? The answer is: science went bad, not just wrong, but really bad after Second World War. Then, many nuclear physicists went into biology. On one side, they gave a physical background to the scholastic biology, but on the other side they taught, and with great insistence, a completely wrong idea that everything in nature is a result of a stochastic processes. The idea, of course, was the old masonic maxim: Order Out Of Chaos, and it was designed to fight God and His creative role. It was fine with the physics of, say, molecules in gas, where the physical laws come as a result of the presence of huge numbers of particles. But it was essentially wrong with biology, where we see a microscopic organism containing a hundred of cells and several organs, identical in all individuals. Of course, it is dead wrong in humans also, where minute differences in body shape are inherited in generations. In biology we deal with deterministic, not stochastic, laws and processes.

Yet, the scientists went ahead with thousands, if not millions, of papers based on the idiotic masonic philosophy; anything contrary is politically incorrect. Moreover, and that, probably, was the main reason – equations look sophisticated and “scientific” in a biological paper. And then – another blow to biology – the computer capabilities. Biologists now rape the keyboard instead of looking in microscope. The third reason is that a biologist, a second class scientist, cannot check your paper with formulas. The next reason: the paper with equations and formulas don’t need to end in a definite biological conclusions, and moreover, even if such conclusions are given, nobody can check this. That is now called theoretical biology.

It became much worse when clinical research, drug testing, etc. made statistical “proof” necessary. I ain’t going into this area, but just the fact tells it all: most of the research in biomedicine is either not reproducible or just a fraud. Scientists have no idea how to get it right. The critical piece by the editor of Lancet said that may be adopting much higher standard of statistical confidence will make the research better. I don’t think so. I think taking four rats, as it used to be done, and see the result is the best way, simply because 15% probability of a usually barely seen success does not count. You don’t need a flu vaccine to shorten your flu symptoms by one day.

Now, back to my papers. I went a different way. I supposed that I should build a model of cell proliferation in a tissue that will work with 100% certainty using minimal necessary assumptions. I did not care how many cells do not obey my rules in a real tissue. It was a deterministic model. And it met with a smashing negative comment from one author who said that I took only a narrow case in a theory (where he was a specialist), that allowed many possible solutions, in fact – an indefinite number of them. Of course, I laughed. I found a principle, a law which resulted in a perfectly functioning tissue. I found the simple, in fact – the simplest rule, which makes cells to divide in a tissue in such way that dividing cells replace the dying cells without changing the shape of this tissue, i. e. preserving the steady state indefinitely. I didn’t care about statistical noise which can introduce deviations from that law. I did not believe that we should start with a noisy model describing all possible situations and then never come to the principle. Newton did not consider the cases when an apple remains to rot on the tree, the cases which undoubtedly would be considered in a modern theory.

My critic, for instance, described cell divisions with the lattices (Voronoy polygons) that can have three-, four- (or more) rayed vertices. I made my cells to have only three-rayed vertices, because I thought that a four-rayed vertice can be represented as two three-rayed vertices, etc. I accepted that all cell sides in a lattice are equal in length. That immediately allowed me to build 3-D models that visually, geometrically reflected their essential topological properties. I considered only pentagonal, hexagonal and heptagonal cells in the lattice, because only these cells could appear as the result of the simplest and uniform cell division.

Many years later, I, purely accidentally, found that my (they now say – minimalistic) representation was a wise one. I found a paper by a Spanish mathematician (M. Vosmediano) who worked with the topology of carbon nanotubes and in one of her presentations she showed the pictures of my models, saying those are “a living curiosity”. Indeed, the atoms of carbon in graphene form lattices with these simplest and uniform, as in my models, parameters. And the nanotubes not only look the same, but they grow by the same topological rules as did my cells. The differences, of course are that 1) carbon atoms are brought into the lattice from surrounding medium, while new cells arise by the division of the existing cells, and 2) carbon atoms are represented by vertices in the lattice, while cells are represented by the bodies of the polygons. The discovery of the topological principles of growth of the nanotubes was made 12 years after my paper was published. At least, I did not plagiarise them! And I am sure they did not. That nature has topological laws working on different levels of the organisation of matter, that was a surprise.

Below: Isolated intestinal crypt (nuclei stained), and the crypt model with its bottom.


Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Global warming RETRACTION

Mike Adams reports in Natural News Sept 19, 2017:

“A stunning new science paper authored by climate change alarmists and published in the science journal Nature Geoscience has just broken the back of the climate change hoax. The paper, authored by Myles R. Allen, Richard J. Millar and others, reveals that global warming climate models are flat wrong, having been deceptively biased toward “worst case” warming predictions that now turn out to be paranoid scaremongering.

The paper, entitled, “Emission budgets and pathways consistent with limiting warming to 1.5 °C,” concludes that the global warming long feared and hyped by everyone from Al Gore to CNN talking heads were based on faulty software models… etc. that don’t stand up to actual measured temperatures in the real world. ”

I am not sure that Adams quotes correctly that paper “concludes” about “Al Gore to CNN talking heads”.
The paper does not say it was all fraud. Who knows, may be they just don’t want to go to jail. The “warming”, however, is closed for the scientists and the doubters too. I wonder if D. Suzuki will refund the money he earned on warming, or at least retract the propaganda directed at children when he said: “We are in trouble”. We indeed are but for a different reason. The trouble is that we have hundreds, if not thousands, of papers written on political demand by many crooks.

2000 years ago, Christ said: “Forgive them Father, because they don’t know what they are doing”. But now they all know what they are doing.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

…… but the company is – Goooogle!

After N. Finkelstein was fired, he said he cannot find another job because employers look his name in Google.

You, who were not born in Soviet Russia, may not understand this Soviet joke:
A meeting in a factory.
The chairman invites people to speak: “Comrad Rabinovich, what are your thoughts?”
Rabinovich: “I have a question. Where are butter, sugar…?
Chairman: “Good question. We will work on it.”
Next meeting. Chairman: “Comrad Abramovich, what are your thoughts?”
Abramovich: “I will not ask where are butter and sugar. I am asking where is Rabinovich?”

The Soviet times now came to America. And it’s not even the Stalin’s times, it’s the earlier times of jewish commissars. They, or their reincarnations, survived and are not a bit less serious about abolishing our civilization; they call it Change. Communists never tell you their goals in advance. If you care to read, read The Protocols of the Elders of Zion. The Protocols may be a forgery, or they may be authentic. What is important is that in 1905 the goals of communists were already known.

They now have policies in place, but don’t make a mistake – the policies can turn bloody. It depends on the reaction. Currently, being unable to find job, and being fired on political charges means exactly that, can very well spell the end of your life and, certainly, the end of the purpose of your life.

Now, back to Google. I was wrong in my previous post, was too optimistic, I thought they try to minimize the damage. No. If I had looked at the smile on the face of Danielle Brown, I would be much less optimistic.

Two years ago, three jewish communists (I. Oransky, RetractionWatch; D. Blum, activist; M. Arthur, President and Provost, University College London) made up a completely bogus “case” of “sexism” against the Nobel Laureate, Sir Tim Hunt, biochemist, in University College London, and fired him. He showed no resistance. Interestingly, only the women in his laboratory organised a protest. I added many comments to the “case” discussions. I noted that the now spreading quasi-communist regime in the West demands that an employee surrender all his individuality, views, attitudes, brains and all, to the employer, a condition never demanded in the communist countries, with the exception of China.

The regime now will be show-trying the new victim, apparently, in court, but first – on Twitter, with anonymous indignation. Some minor variations of the Soviet and Hitler’s trials, but basically – the same scenario. The result is predictable: no thrashing Danielle Brown, that’s it, that’s impossible.

Today, so-called intellectuals do not see themselves as the successors of Galileo, Giordano Bruno and all the people who knew that telling the truth was the purpose of their lives. Today, science itself is falsified, destroyed and is stolen by the thieving jewish communists. What is left? The destroyers feed the lies of multiple genders and cosmic travel to the idiots. Who is left? Mutilated bodies and perverted brains, who, and I am not exaggerating here, feel “positive” about it.

Google, by the way, initially appeared as the search engine that did not censor the results, as the older AltaVista used to do. Watch the Google Change now! Well, I am sorry, you won’t be able to watch anything, it won’t let you. In the hands of talented Danielle, Google becomes the instrument of Diversity. Diversity is achieved when people of multiple genders, nations and colors, all have exactly the same brains. There is a good expression for this in Boswell’s memoirs of Doctor Johnson: “One had better be palsied at eighteen…”.

And the last thing I want to write here would be this question: Is there anything in this story that was only staged to establish a precedent of what seems to be an unbelievable case of unopposed communist tyranny in America, the country with long and proud history of freedom and free speech? I will not elaborate. I just have hard time believing my eyes.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Re: “Google’s Ideological Echo Chamber”

It’s “viral”. And anonymous. I guess it was written by several people, may be by women, to alleviate the scandalous situation with “gender bias”. It was written by stupid, intellectually inferior writer(s) as there is no actual proof of its multiple arguments. The arguments and the proof for the women lagging behind men in intellectual abilities, however, do exist.

Among the thousands of painters who created the treasures of our civilisation, there were only a couple of second class women painters. The same with the architects, scientists, writers, etc., etc. Were women prevented, as the jewish communists tell us, from creating all these treasures? Certainly, not: these men, the pride of our civilisation, were, for all previous centuries, mostly self-educated! They had interest in all these areas, and they pursued their interests. Even today, after decades of literally forcing women to study, they cannot do what men can. Moreover, it is clear that when the task becomes more complicated, the gap in intellectual abilities is increasing; with the simple tasks, women succeed equally.

While the difference is clear, the causes of it remain obscure, in great part due to the political prohibition on such research. I have some thoughts on these causes.

What is scientific mind? Who are the scientists? A scientist is a person who is able to perceive and has intuition to tell what the Nature is able or not able to do. He, subconsciously, due solely to the his peculiar direction of thinking, finds a correct solution for the problem. How? O, that’s very simple.

He understands the things, the phenomena and the words literally, i. e. he removes associative meanings from the text. He reads slowly, very slowly. A scientist does not memorize anything. His mental job is to find the analogy of the process, or the phenomenon studied, in a graphic representation. He understands that words are a poor approximation to the reality, while the graphic representation, the mechanical picture of the process in his mind’s eye can be built, studied, compared to reality and corrected.

Women do not use this way of thinking, they use words. Words form their memory, their knowledge base and their “scientific”, God forbids, papers. (And that’s why, above, I first mentioned painters, not scientists.)

And, there is another, connected, difference – women have little interest and ability in mechanics. But the Nature operates, at all levels, physics, chemistry, biology, only mechanically. In every process, there is an underlaying mechanical level which of course explains the phenomena of the upper level of organisation of matter.

In fact, the current system of education is reinforcing that inborn difference between men and women. They teach fast reading, use of generic terms rather than the concrete ones. It is teaching fraudulent manipulations with words. It has drowned science in the fraudulent teachings of the jewish “philosopher” Derrida. It makes clear things obscure and “relativistic”.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Climate change. Not understanding science

Some ten years ago I posted, in the Chronicle of Higher Education, a short note debunking the global warming theory. The points, as I remember them, were:

1. Nobody ever measured the average temperature of the Earth.
2. It surely would seem ridiculous to every scientist to talk about the increase of 0.6 degrees in 100 years, because fluctuations of temperature and the local differences make the 0.6 degrees indistinguishable from the noise.
3. The apocalyptic predictions of the effect of the increase in CO2 are ridiculous because in the Earth past there was time when life was thriving in giant forests and the concentration of CO2 was certainly much greater.

The finding of global warming is claimed to be a result of computer calculations. It certainly looks to me as feeding to the computer such data which had to result in the convenient, not too big, not too little, 0.6 degrees increase.

Global warming theory is using a wrong statistics for a proof. The increase in temperature within the last 100 years, whether it is true or false, is nothing but an anecdotal evidence. There is no comparison with other 100-year periods; of course, there are no such data, but without such data the 0.6 degrees is just a meaningless figure. Moreover, we know that in the Middle Ages there was what is called the Little Ice Age. Obviously, even much greater than 0.6 degrees changes in temperatures can occur without any human activity involved.

Apparently, understanding that the 0.6 degrees increase over the last 100 years tells us absolutely nothing about the future 100 years, the “warmists” went further. They found the mechanism of global warming in the man made increase of the CO2 concentration in the air. The 0.6 degrees increase in temperature now stays in the background, and the CO2 theory serves as a basis for apocalyptic predictions. Nice and very scientific, isn’t it? Except that apocalyptic predictions based on CO2 have nothing to do with science (see # 3 above). Yet, we should not simply ignore the possibility that the temperatures (and humidity) in the age of giant forests were very likely higher!!

Canada TV is showing scientist David Suzuki explaining global warming to little kids. He tells them how to understand the warming: “Climate change, says he, means: we are in trouble”. He is not using the words “global warming” but using a new modification of the formula – the “climate change”, which he wants to be understood as warming. The little kids are deceived, they are told: have a fear of the catastrophe in your guts, trust the government and pay enormous taxes. Suzuki is using fear mongering and the total inability of the public to understand science.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Feminism, communist terror in Canada

A few months ago, Prime Minister Trudeau said he is a feminist. Nobody reads newspapers, but watching TV is becoming essential. TV let us know that hate of feminism is hate crime; not saying it is the law, but that is the usual method of introducing communist terror. Slogans into your brain, then – into the law.

What is feminism? It is a conspiracy theory (men hate and exploit women) manufactured by communist revolutionaries in 19th century to attract 1/2 of humanity into the crowd of the deprived and exploited. Semi-educated, mentally deranged, sexually deviant, abandoned, violent women were recruited in Russia by the revolutionaries. Feminism further degraded these women, to the animals; they became females. Millions of these women became an insane, wretched, syphilitic refuse of the revolution.

Feminist maxims are read as the code of behavior of hardened criminals: Never apologise, Never be questioned by a man, etc. In Toronto, feminists bombed Litton Industries. In Sweden they drink menstrual blood on feminist festivals, (there exists a recording). The females became simply “pussies”. In Moscow, they desecrated Christian Temple. In Italy they set museum on fire. Thousands of these crimes are being committed. Feminists are communist criminals, their goal is destruction of civilisation. Feminists are trained in insanity, savagery and irrationality. They go naked on the streets and protest sexual “objectivisation” of women.

The original teaching the feminists received from jewish communist criminals (trotzkiists), whose goal was the world communist revolution. However, a few decades ago, some of them decided that jews are too rich to be true communists, and they separated. Never mind, both groups are sadistic communist destroyers.

In Canada, feminists are pushed to the top of the country administration, using a completely fraudulent claim of the past discrimination which they suffered before they were born. They became communist attack dogs, conducting “gender wars” and destroying every decent individual, men and women alike. They penetrated universities creating completely fraudulent “social science” and “women studies”. Communist and feminist propaganda is making a heroic intellectual out of every pornographer, narcoman and pervert. It has been reported that 1 in 4 teenage girls now has sexually transmitted disease.

One of the crimes committed by the feminists is killing their children to “punish” and “revenge” their boyfriend or husband. Yet, in the new feminist Canada, this is not a crime anymore, it became “post-partum depression” that curiously may last for several years and is not connected to any revenge. Feminists decision makers routinely abolish the civilized law and subvert justice.

For many years, the standard of attitude for canadian women was: “I am not a feminist, but …”, followed by some moderate female grievance. The standard now is: obey to feminism, under the pain of being fired from the job or imprisoned. Finally you have to realise why people call these monsters “feminazis”. They are women-parasites stealing from the real doers and killing them.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment